McKenna, CERN and the time-travelers
You may have noticed the many articles popping up describing the anticipation felt by the world physics community over the completion of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, specifically the idea that the first experiments may serve as a portal for future time-travelers to burst into our dimension and turn our age into a cosmic tourist-trap. This sounds strange coming from some of the most advance scientists in the world but the idea was already espoused by Terence McKenna. When asked to describe what his proposed 2012 eschaton would actually be, he would first explain how speculation is near impossible due to things like event horizons and catastrophe theory but then he offered the analogy of the first time-machine being invented that could forward and back through time but not before the time-machine was invented. So on that day all these time-trotters would show up on that momentous day for history, and thus revealing the endpoint of the novelty/habit wave of history.
Just goes to show, you don't need a physics degree to understand the contours of the multiverse, just 5 dried grams'll do the trick.
Here's one of the many blurbs and articles about the CERN LHC time travel idea:
Futurenauts Using Ultra-duper Atomsmasher
& New Scientist cover story.Labels: 2012, big-bang, cosmology, physics, psilocybin, science, synchronos, technology
1 Comments:
The innate problems with time travel still exist given this scenario. While it does deal with the question of why aren't there time travelers walking around the world today, it does nothing to solve the issue of the time travel paradox. If person from 2100 goes back to visit this day that time travel is invented and during his trip accidentally kills a person from 2051, it could potentially still greatly alter the world from which to 2100 time traveler came from. This change could potentially have made the existence of the 2100 time traveler nonexistent, making the act of the killing impossible, making the changes that would have occurred also not possible, making the time traveler from 2100 still alive to still do the act.
While it is a nice idea and allows for people who still hold out for time travel, it does not deal with almost all of the innate problems with time travel itself.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home